Warning: base64_decode() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/eheupel/eclecticechoes.com/wp-content/plugins/askapache-google-404/askapache-google-404.php on line 156
Caprellids » Eclectic Echoes
Skip to content

Author Archives: Eric

Caprellids

Ok…if you want to find out what a Caprellid is without the family spin skip to the bottom.

One of the family’s big presents this year was a nice zoom dissecting microscope with a set of 50 metazoan and 50 plant biology classroom slides. Johann and Tammy have been going through a few prepared slides per session, but whenever he gets on the scopes at the university, he usually gets to look at bacteria through the epifluorescent scopes or all kinds of zooplankton through the dissecting scopes there, so it is not really the same looking at a dead, prepared slide, many of which are largely unrecognizable as being something once alive.

For one of my classes last week, we did a bivalve particle clearing rate experiment using some mussels (Mytilus edulis) gathered from the water just off campus. As I was separating out some of the mussels in the lab, I noticed a ~15mm character in a preying mantis pose — it looked almost like a walking stick doing a Karate kid final kick, a Caprellid amphipod. I separated the small mussel it was on from the rest of the bunch and put it aside in a beaker. After everything was cleaned up from the experiment, I took the mussel and amphipod home to Johann and Tammy.

When I got home, I set the beaker on the kitchen counter while I stripped off the book satchel, laptop, coat, etc… before I was done Johann was already staring closely at the two occupants of the beaker. By the time I had turned back around, he assaulted me with, “Cool! What is that?! That’s mytilus, but what is THAT?!”

Caprellid Amphipod

He spent the next hour watching both the caprellid and the mussel, (Gotta love low heat light sources!), calling Tammy and me over to examine some detail he had noticed or watching for some new behavior he just witnessed. The caprellid mostly repeated a pretty set cycle: it did its characteristic pose and swayed its upper body through the water, then remained still for minutes at a time. It did occasionally maneuver to a new location with it’s inchworm style motion.

The mussel opened and closed periodically, which allowed Johann to observe the mantle skirt closely. It also began to cement its byssel threads to the beaker using its foot. Johann watched this both through the scope and with the naked eye. After an hour he had sketched both thoroughly and was done for the night. Tammy, Johann, and I decided we can’t tell exactly what species the caprellid was, though we suspect it is a male Caprella mutica, an invasive species known to be here in the Long Island Sound, specifically in the Mystic estuary.

Caprellid amphipod

I took the opportunity to see if I could hand hold the camera and get a decent shot through the scope, with and without one of the 15x occulars in place. While not as nice as having a dedicated imager like we have in the teaching lab, it is a decent result for hand held and a good starting point. I’m thinking about modifying a lens cap/body cap to help in alignment and holding the camera in place.

So what is a caprellid amphipod?

Caprellid amphipods (a.k.a. skeleton shrimp) are small marine crustaceans which have been found on diverse habitats from deep ocean hydrothermal vents to shallow estuarine waters. These small amphipods spend their entire life attached to some form of substrate — usually seaweeds, and encrusting or non-mobile invertebrates such as barnacles, bryozoans, and mussels. They are also often found on docks,ropes, and nets used in aquaculture. Using the last three pairs of appendages, they cling to seaweed, bivalves, or other substrate with their claws (gnathopods) spread wide as they bend side to side waving through the water.

“That’s a caprellid,” said Dr. Jon Moore. To demonstrate its behavior, he and Mercer Brugler invented the “Caprellid dance,” holding up both hands and waving them, while shifting hips from side to side. This made clear to everyone what kind of organism they were looking at.
“Oh yes, the caprellid!”

Log from the NOAA Mountains of the Sea exploration:
May 15 2004

Caprellids appear to be omnivorous opportunists, eating anything including diatoms, copepods, amphipods, and nematodes. In turn they are eaten by a variety of fish, thus they form a link between the single celled algae and predatory fish.

cmutica.jpg

A Caprella mutica male (top) and female from Dr. Gail Ashton’s work at SAMS

Caprella mutica is a fairly recent invader to Long Island Sound. Originally from the shores of Japan and China, it was confirmed in Connecticut waters when it was found at the Mystic Yacht Yard in 2003. C. mutica has also successfully colonized most of Europe’s shores, the Pacific Northwest, and New Zealand. Part of its success stems from its tolerance for a wide range of temperatures (-1.8 to 30°C) and salinities (15 — 35+psu). (Ashton et al. 2007)

Ashton, G. V., Willis, K. J., Cook, E. J. & Burrows, M. (2007). Distribution of the introduced amphipod, Caprella mutica Schurin, 1935 (Amphipoda: Caprellida: Caprellidae) on the west coast of Scotland and a review of its global distribution. Hydrobiologia 590, 31-41
DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-0754-y

Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
subPhylum: Crustacea
Class: Malacostraca
Order: Amphipoda
Family: Caprellidea
Genus: Cabrella
species: Caprella mutica

Guess who….

CRW_2501.jpg

1700 per paper

Over the past 20 years the Japanese “Scientific” whaling program has taken between 8,000 and 9,000 whales, including the 1,000 to be taken in this year’s hunt.

capt.sge.grx19.070208040606.photo00.photo.default-473x512.jpg

A minke whale mother and calf being dragged aboard a Japanese factory whaling ship. Photo AFP

Increasing pressure from Greenpeace and the Sea Shepherd disrupted this years hunt for three weeks, but the biggest blow to the whaling may come from ex-Midnight Oil lead man Peter Garrett. Now the Australian Minister of the Environment, Peter Garrett released the above image taken by an Australian Customs official. The customs officials were tailing and documenting the hunt which Australia considers illegal. The Japanese government first claimed the photo of a mother and calf being hauled into a factory whaling ship were fake, but now claim that both whales were adult females, and that Australia is engaged in “dangerous emotional propaganda” agaist its “scientific” whaling efforts.

So how scientific is the whaling effort?

Well, two years ago that question was examined by an informal panel of Australian scientists on the ABC show Catalyst. At that time the 18 year old scientific whaling program had taken 6,800 whales. The panel found that of the 55 peer reviewed papers published by the Japanese government sponsored whaling program only 14 were relevant to study of cetaceans or developing and managing a whaling industry. Only 4 of those 14 would have required lethal sampling methods to actually obtain the information required. So the final score, by their count, was 1700 whales killed for each paper.

While I’m reluctant to condone the aggressive actions of Sea Shepherd, on this issue I find myself wondering if it is not warranted since the Japanese fleet is violating the spirit of international law in waters where no individual nation has the authority to intercede, yet every nation has a vested interest.

In related news Terri Irwin, who gave permission to the Sea Shepherd to rechristen their flagship in honor of Steve, has set up an agreement with Oregon State University to launch a southern ocean whale research program to prove to the Japanese you don’t need lethal whaling to conduct significant whale research.

While their future is still up in the air, the whale’s past has gotten a little clearer…

(Edit 9pm) It seems the past is even clearer with a paper posted today in Systemic Biology analyzing genetic and morphological evidence to track the evolution of baleen whales.

The Schmidt Sting Pain Index Calibration

From Zooilogix’ The Schmidt Sting Pain Index:

Although Schmidt claims he is no masochist, the high cost to low benefit ratio of his research combined with descriptions of his suffering that sound like fine wine reviews make us wonder. Here is a sample from Wikipedia:

1.0 Sweat bee: Light, ephemeral, almost fruity. A tiny spark has singed a single hair on your arm.
1.2 Fire ant: Sharp, sudden, mildly alarming. Like walking across a shag carpet & reaching for the light switch.
1.8 Bullhorn acacia ant: A rare, piercing, elevated sort of pain. Someone has fired a staple into your cheek.
2.0 Bald-faced hornet: Rich, hearty, slightly crunchy. Similar to getting your hand mashed in a revolving door.
2.0 Yellowjacket: Hot and smoky, almost irreverent. Imagine W. C. Fields extinguishing a cigar on your tongue.
2.x Honey bee and European hornet: Like a matchhead that flips off and burns on your skin.
3.0 Red harvester ant: Bold and unrelenting. Somebody is using a drill to excavate your ingrown toenail.
3.0 Paper wasp: Caustic & burning. Distinctly bitter aftertaste. Like spilling a beaker of hydrochloric acid on a paper cut.
4.0 Pepsis wasp: Blinding, fierce, shockingly electric. A running hair drier has been dropped into your bubble bath.
4.0+ Bullet ant: Pure, intense, brilliant pain. Like fire-walking over flaming charcoal with a 3-inch rusty nail in your heel.

Does anyone know how to get in touch with this guy? We’d like to do a personal interview.

(Via Zooillogix.)

And I would like to speak to him about calibrating his pain index to other invertebrates. Particularly I want to put the index to cnidarians (Jellies, anemones and corals) and arachnids (spiders and scorpions).

Focus

How It All Ends

Watch… then see the complete series at the The Manpollo Project

Eclectic Echoes is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache