Skip to content

Category Archives: Uncategorized

NASA TV

We are watching STS-125, the final shuttle mission to repair the Hubble Telescope. Right now Michael J. Massimino and Michael T. Good are in the 6th hour of their spacewalk to repair the STIS package on the Hubble, including a cover with 111 tiny screws.

This is a special mission for us, one we feel connected to if only in some extremely remote way. We watched the ramp up and mission development on NOVA Science Now about a year ago. In the mean time we have followed the writings of Phil Plait, who writes Bad Astronomy, and worked on the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph, or STIS package that is being worked on today. This mission also features K. Megan McArthur, an Oceanographer trained at Scripps, as one of the mission specialists. She’ll be the last person to handle Hubble.

Of course we have enjoyed so any of the shots from Hubble in the Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD) so we desperately want to enjoy many more fine images and discoveries.

We have also found another connection to the recent space adventures in what might seem an odd place. The Beagle Project, which aims to rebuild the HMS Beagle to set out on round the world science and outreach in the spirit of the great explorations of Darwin et al. have become partners with the ISS and NASA. Karen James’ infectious enthusiasm for this partnership have been rubbing off on us here.

It was not a straight forward mission to begin with, but somehow they managed to find all sorts of problems and issues that got in the way. Things got tense and it seemed as though everything was going to hell in a hand basket quickly, yet they stayed on it and eventually overcame all the problems to successfully replace the STIS.

Perseverance.

Happy Gentoo

From my Aunt Sharlene, through Dad, now here, especially for Johann, Tammy and Kevin – penguin lovers all!

Whispers

The residuals of English classism can be seen everywhere. Quite often I feel like we are re-enacting something out of Pride and Prejudice. People are supposed to stay within the sphere in which they’ve been bought up. The haves are the masters and the have-nots are the servants and tenants.

A few years ago, I went into the local yarn shop to see my friend and mentioned we had been at Wal-mart to buy something. A look of horror filled her eyes, she shushed me, and whispered that I shouldn’t say that so loudly. She was trying to help me, to make sure that the other women didn’t hear and wouldn’t hold it against me. I was confused. What’s wrong with shopping at Wal-mart?

I refuse to lie about who I am and where I’ve been, but to a certain extent, I find myself playing this game while we live in Mystic.  We found a homeschooling group we’d like to give a try, but I have to appear to be better off than we are, at least in the way I dress. In preparation for a play date, I put on my linen pants, a white designer T-shirt, and my roses china dangle earrings. I braided my hair. But I didn’t have the shoes I needed to complete the outfit.

Then I remembered one of the fashion quirks here is to wear flip-flops with everything. One of our old neighbors at Factory Square is a slave to fashion. She has at least 20 pairs of flip-flops and each one is an accessory for a specific outfit. I’ve seen women wearing fancy outfits with $2.00 flip-flops in a matching color. Personally, I don’t think that goes together, but going to Wal-mart for a cheap pair of flip-flops solved my problem.

What I find completely ironic is the looks I got while I was in Wal-mart. The reason I was there was to dress up for the play date to pass myself off as not being money poor. The other shoppers were staring at me with nasty faces. Many other times I’ve been there in my grubbies and I’ve heard people around me whisper about someone else who looked expensively dressed once she was out of earshot: “What is SHE doing here? She doesn’t need to be shopping in here. THOSE rich people have some nerve. They take advantage of everything. They have the money to go elsewhere and here they are shopping in a store that’s meant for us.”

I was having a conversation with one of the mothers in the homeschooling group. She was talking about the importance of owning a pet and asked if we had a dog. I said that we didn’t. Then she lowered her voice and said, “Oh, that’s right… (whispering) you rent.”

I’ve been told we are “too friendly”. As one friend put it, we are intense people and not everyone can handle that. If we are too friendly that is interpreted as being too forward or out to get something from the other person.  You can’t just be a really nice person here without drawing suspicion.

We are military kids and Eric served in the Army. We are viewed as being unstable, because we grew up moving around a lot. The truth is that we have contributed to this community just as much if not more than the locals have. And we are looking for a place to put down roots. We also have benefited from traveling to different parts of the world and have a lot to offer.

Everything seems to be viewed as a service you go out and buy, even church. You don’t search for a spiritual home with people you feel comfortable with and can share and worship with. You go church shopping. Does the church have the right demographic you are looking for? Do they have better youth programs? What features do they have to offer? Only then do people attend to see if they like what the minister has to say. Church community doesn’t even come into the picture. It’s no wonder that in our search for a church community where you can feel God’s presence when you enter the building, we’ve come up empty.

We didn’t seem to have this many problems when we were out West. At least I can honestly say I’ve done everything possible short of selling my soul to try to fit in here and form a social network. What ever happened to the kids get along, the parents get along, let’s get together and have fun? I’m learning how to do small talk better, but I still feel like a fish out of water.

I worry what living in this atmosphere is teaching Johann. We’ve always told Johann to take people as they are and to judge someone by their character, not their color, creed, religion, or possessions. He greets everyone with a “Hello, Friend!” attitude. Eric and I are struggling not to become jaded. What we value isn’t always being reflected by the people around us and it’s confusing.

The best way I could think of to explain it to Johann was to use Little House on the Prairie as an example. We are like the Ingalls family. We believe in working hard, playing hard when it’s time to play, helping our neighbors, following the Golden Rule, and not prejudging someone based on superficial criteria. We are rich because we have the basic necessities of life and we have each other. We live in a place where there are a lot of Olesons. We need to do our best to get along with them while we are here without becoming like them. But, in the back of my mind, I keep thinking the sooner we move, the better.

1700 per paper

Over the past 20 years the Japanese “Scientific” whaling program has taken between 8,000 and 9,000 whales, including the 1,000 to be taken in this year’s hunt.

capt.sge.grx19.070208040606.photo00.photo.default-473x512.jpg

A minke whale mother and calf being dragged aboard a Japanese factory whaling ship. Photo AFP

Increasing pressure from Greenpeace and the Sea Shepherd disrupted this years hunt for three weeks, but the biggest blow to the whaling may come from ex-Midnight Oil lead man Peter Garrett. Now the Australian Minister of the Environment, Peter Garrett released the above image taken by an Australian Customs official. The customs officials were tailing and documenting the hunt which Australia considers illegal. The Japanese government first claimed the photo of a mother and calf being hauled into a factory whaling ship were fake, but now claim that both whales were adult females, and that Australia is engaged in “dangerous emotional propaganda” agaist its “scientific” whaling efforts.

So how scientific is the whaling effort?

Well, two years ago that question was examined by an informal panel of Australian scientists on the ABC show Catalyst. At that time the 18 year old scientific whaling program had taken 6,800 whales. The panel found that of the 55 peer reviewed papers published by the Japanese government sponsored whaling program only 14 were relevant to study of cetaceans or developing and managing a whaling industry. Only 4 of those 14 would have required lethal sampling methods to actually obtain the information required. So the final score, by their count, was 1700 whales killed for each paper.

While I’m reluctant to condone the aggressive actions of Sea Shepherd, on this issue I find myself wondering if it is not warranted since the Japanese fleet is violating the spirit of international law in waters where no individual nation has the authority to intercede, yet every nation has a vested interest.

In related news Terri Irwin, who gave permission to the Sea Shepherd to rechristen their flagship in honor of Steve, has set up an agreement with Oregon State University to launch a southern ocean whale research program to prove to the Japanese you don’t need lethal whaling to conduct significant whale research.

While their future is still up in the air, the whale’s past has gotten a little clearer…

(Edit 9pm) It seems the past is even clearer with a paper posted today in Systemic Biology analyzing genetic and morphological evidence to track the evolution of baleen whales.

Eclectic Echoes is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache